The red stack in figure 18.1 adds up to 195 kWh per day per person. The
green stack adds up to about 180 kWh/d/p. A close race! But please
remember: in calculating our production stack we threw all economic,
social, and environmental constraints to the wind. Also, some of our green
contributors are probably incompatible with each other: our photovoltaic
panels and hot-water panels would clash with each other on roofs; and our
solar photovoltaic farms using 5% of the country might compete with the
energy crops with which we covered 75% of the country. If we were to lose
just one of our bigger green contributors – for example, if we decided that
deep offshore wind is not an option, or that panelling 5% of the country
with photovoltaics at a cost of £200 000 per person is not on – then the
production stack would no longer match the consumption stack.
Furthermore, even if our red consumption stack were lower than our
green production stack, it would not necessarily mean our energy sums
are adding up. You can’t power a TV with cat food, nor can you feed a cat
from a wind turbine. Energy exists in different forms – chemical, electrical,
kinetic, and heat, for example. For a sustainable energy plan to add up, we
need both the forms and amounts of energy consumption and production
to match up. Converting energy from one form to another – from chemical
to electrical, as at a fossil-fuel power station, or from electrical to chemical,
as in a factory making hydrogen from water – usually involves substantial
losses of useful energy. We will come back to this important detail in
Chapter 27, which will describe some energy plans that do add up.
Here we’ll reflect on our estimates of consumption and production,
compare them with official averages and with other people’s estimates,
and discuss how much power renewables could plausibly deliver in a
country like Britain.
The questions we’ll address in this chapter are: